|
Last August, a single member of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission ruled, in a private arbitration, that oral fluid (saliva) drug testing was a better method of testing for impairment than urine drug testing. The employer involved, Shell Refining (Australia) Pty Ltd, sought a review of this decision. The review panel, made up of three members of the Commission, upheld the decision in late May 2009. The panel found that an employee returning a positive oral fluid test is more likely to be impaired at the time of the test than an employee returning a positive urine test.
Please click on the PDF link to read the full article.
|